Waddle Street
Programs
  • All programs
  • Insight programs
  • What changed
  • Competitions
Networking
  • Contacts
  • Find people
  • Write a note
Prep
  • Learn
  • Drills
  • My answers
  • Markets
  • Resume review
  • Resources
Industries
  • Overview
  • Find your fit
  • Guides
Waddle Street
LearnDrillsMy answersMarketsResume reviewResources

Learn

Learn/Valuation: comps and precedents
LearnValuation: comps and precedents

0 of 6 lessons, sign in to save

B Basic

  • The three methods and the football field8m
  • Comparable companies: building the setPro11m
  • Multiples in practice: from median to share pricePro9m

A Advanced

  • Precedent transactionsPro10m
  • Other methods: sum of the parts, dividends, liquidation, LBOPro12m
  • Judgment: which method, and the common pitfallsPro9m
  • FlashcardsPro0/24
  • Basic quizPro80% passes
  • Advanced quizPro80% passes
  • Terms

Basic, lesson 1 of 3

The three methods and the football field

Bankers value a company three main ways and show the results side by side. Knowing what each method assumes is worth more than memorizing the list.

8 min, 2 checks

1Two families of valuation

Relative valuation asks what the market pays for similar things. If comparable companies trade at 10 times EBITDA, ours is probably worth something near that. It is fast and grounded in real prices, but it inherits whatever mood the market is in.

Intrinsic valuation asks what the company's own future cash flows are worth today. The discounted cash flow, or DCF, is the main version. It does not care what anyone else trades at, but it is only as good as the forecasts and the discount rate you feed it.

2The three standard methods

MethodFamilyThe question it answers
Comparable companies (trading comps)RelativeWhat do similar public companies trade for today?
Precedent transactionsRelativeWhat have buyers paid to acquire similar companies outright?
Discounted cash flowIntrinsicWhat are this company's own future cash flows worth today?

Banks almost always run all three, because each fails in a different way. Comps are only as good as the peer set. Precedents may be old or few. A DCF can say anything if you lean on the assumptions. Agreement across methods builds confidence; disagreement tells you where to look.

Check 1

Which method does not depend on what other companies are worth?

3The football field

The output is rarely a single number. Each method produces a range, and bankers stack the ranges as horizontal bars on one chart. Because the bars look like the yard lines on a field, the chart is called a football field.

MethodLowHigh
52 week trading range$18$28
Trading comps$22$27
Precedent transactions$26$33
DCF$21$32
LBO analysis$19$24
A football field in table form (value per share)

A board looking at this sees where most of the methods overlap, roughly $26 to $27 here (the LBO range sits below it), and where a proposed offer sits. The 52 week range is not a valuation method, but it is always shown as a reference point because shareholders anchor on it.

Check 2

In the table above, which method shows the highest range, and why is that typical?

Terms in this lesson: Football field, EBITDA, Discounted cash flow, Comparable companies analysis, Precedent transactions, Leveraged buyout.

How this gets asked in an interview

The opener for valuation: name the methods, say what each assumes, and say which tends to give the higher value. Keep it to under a minute.

  • Walk me through the main valuation methodologies.
  • What is a football field?
  • When would you not use a DCF?
Drill Valuation, ten questions

2 checks in this lesson. Sign in to keep your progress.

Next lesson