Waddle Street
Programs
  • All programs
  • Insight programs
  • What changed
  • Competitions
Networking
  • Contacts
  • Find people
  • Write a note
Prep
  • Learn
  • Drills
  • My answers
  • Markets
  • Resume review
  • Resources
Industries
  • Overview
  • Find your fit
  • Guides
Waddle Street
LearnDrillsMy answersMarketsResume reviewResources

Learn

Learn/Founders, diligence, and the pitch
LearnFounders, diligence, and the pitch

0 of 6 lessons, sign in to save

B Basic

  • Judging founders10m
  • What product market fit looks likePro9m
  • Moats at each stagePro8m

A Advanced

  • Running diligence on a seed and a Series APro11m
  • The two minute pitchPro10m
  • Defending the pitch, and the fit questionsPro11m
  • FlashcardsPro0/16
  • Basic quizPro80% passes
  • Advanced quizPro80% passes
  • Terms

Basic, lesson 1 of 3

Judging founders

At seed, the team is most of the bet. Look for evidence of speed, learning, and the ability to recruit, and check it with people the founders did not pick.

10 min, 3 checks

1What to look for

TraitEvidence you can collectWeak substitute
Founder market fitYears inside the problem, a network of buyers, a technical edgeInterest in the space
SpeedVersions shipped and customers signed in the last 90 daysA detailed roadmap
LearningWhat they believed six months ago that turned out wrongConfidence in every answer
RecruitingStrong people who left good jobs to join, and whyA list of advisors
SellingCustomers or investors they closed themselvesA polished deck
Traits and the evidence for them

Cofounder dynamics matter as much as individuals. Ask how they met, how they split equity and why, who decides what, and about a time they disagreed. A very uneven split between two full time founders, or cofounders who met recently, is a question to answer, not an automatic pass.

Check 1

Which is the best evidence that a founder can recruit?

2References on and off the list

On list references are people the founder suggests. They will be positive, so ask for specifics: a time the founder handled bad news, how they hire, whether the reference would work for them again. Off list (back channel) references are people you find yourself: former colleagues, customers, investors who passed. They are where real signal comes from.

Worked example

Reading eight references

  1. 1Three on list, five off list.
  2. 2All three on list are glowing. Three of the five off list independently say the founder struggles to delegate.
  3. 3Three of eight overall, 37.5 percent, raise the same point, and all three were people the founder did not choose.

One lukewarm comment is noise. The same issue from three people who do not know each other is a pattern. Raise it with the founder and ask how they plan to handle it as the team grows.

Check 2

You run 10 reference calls. Four mention the same concern, and all four are off list. What share of calls raised it, in percent?

%

Check 3

Why are off list references more useful?

Terms in this lesson: Seed round.

How this gets asked in an interview

When asked about a team, name the trait and the evidence. 'Strong team' is not an answer; 'they shipped four versions in two months and their first engineer left a senior role to join' is.

  • How do you evaluate a founding team at pre seed?
  • What do you ask in a reference call?
  • What are red flags in a founding team?
Drill Evaluating a startup, ten questions

3 checks in this lesson. Sign in to keep your progress.

Next lesson